She alleged that Borchetta knew of her feelings toward Braun and through the sale of her masters they were both complicit in “controlling a woman who didn’t want to be associated with them. Although Swift stated that she had “made peace with the fact that eventually would sell them,” she said that she was deeply upset that he had decided to sell them to Braun. On JSwift announced in another Tumblr post that Scooter Braun had made a deal with Big Machine Label which included the purchasing of her masters. 2018, after Taylor’s deal with Big Machine Records ended, she joined Universal Music Group with a deal that would enable her to own her masters going forward, However, her first six albums would still be controlled by Big Machine Label. By owning the masters (which refers to the first recording of a song), Braun has complete control over the six Swift albums produced under her former label, Big Machine Records. In an interview with CBS in August of 2019, Swift said that she would re-record her first six albums due to her masters being sold to Scooter Braun, a record executive who has been at odds with Swift in the past. Borchetta allegedly told Swift and her team that she could only use her music if she agreed to “not re-record copycat versions of her songs” and if she stopped “talking about and Braun.” Swift claimed that this would negatively impact both her ability to perform for the American Music Awards, in which she would be performing a hits medley in honor of receiving the Artist of the Decade Award, and the production process for her Netflix documentary series.Īccording to Swift, Borchetta and Braun did not want her to perform her music on television because they viewed it as re-recording her old music. 14, Taylor Swift made a post on her Tumblr account alleging that Scott Borchetta and Scooter Braun were prohibiting her from performing songs still owned by her former label Big Machine Records. The matter was adjourned for further review on October 18.Ĭrabtree is also charged with one count of attempted murder, one of torture, two of fraud, and four of attempted fraud. Justice Davis ordered the Crown to prepare its arguments against why the application should be rejected. Ĭrabtree’s defense barrister Angus Edwards told the court that he intended to make an application to “sever off” the murder charge related to Erin’s death from the rest of the charges before the court. McCarthy said the court could still proceed with both murder charges being heard together because the evidence was “cross-admissible.” Crabtree is accused of murdering her 18-year-old daughter Erin in 2012 and her 26-year-old son Jonathan in 2017. She also allegedly claimed insurance after their deaths.ĭeputy Director of Public Prosecutions Philip McCarthy KC told Brisbane Supreme Court on Friday the case against Crabtree was “a little complicated” because of the varying evidence related to both deaths. It will also be alleged that Crabtree heavily medicated her children to keep them both bedridden and claim disability payments on their behalf. Maree Mavis Crabtree, 57, charged with murdering her two adult children is hoping to have two separate trials for the alleged killings, a court has been told. Initially, both deaths were ruled as suicides before Crabtree was later charged with murder. Jonathan also died from a fatal overdose of drugs in 2017.
The Crown prosecution case against Crabtree will allege in court that she gave Erin a fatal overdose of drugs before leaving her to go on a cruise with Jonathan in 2012. Maree Mavis Crabtree, 57, of Maudsland, is accused of murdering her 18-year-old daughter Erin in 2012 and her 26-year-old son Jonathan in 2017. A Gold Coast mother charged with murdering her two adult children is hoping to have two separate trials for the alleged killings, a court has been told.
0 kommentar(er)
